Article 1119

Title of the article

PLATO THEORY OF FORMS IN THE CONTEXT OF CONSTITUTIONAL AXIOLOGY 

Authors

Likhter Pavel Leonidovich, Candidate of juridical sciences, associate professor, sub-department of private and public law, Penza State University (40 Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia), E-mail: lixter@mail.ru 

Index UDK

140.12 

DOI

10.21685/2072-3016-2019-1-1 

Abstract

Background. Today, none of the branches of law can afford to engage in simple registration of legal norms and events. The search for philosophical grounds allows us to change the angle of view on constitutional law as a phenomenon that reflects and directs the development of society and the state in a certain way. The aim of the work is to analyze certain aspects of constitutional axiology in the light of the teachings of Plato.
Materials and methods. The implementation of research tasks was achieved on the basis of an analysis of the regulatory framework (constitutional legal acts, current Russian legislation, international agreements), as well as Greek and other philosophical literature. As research methods, historico-legal, comparative-legal, logical methods (deduction, induction), etc. were used.
Results. Some aspects of the Plato theory of Forms in the context of modern constitutional axiology have been explored. Consistently considered are possible approaches to constitutional and legal values as intelligible objects of rational knowledge.
Conclusions. The modern theory of constitutional law unjustifiably ignores the conclusion of the ancient thought that it is often necessary to determine the value of an individual as a patrimonial one. It has a dynamic character and is determined by the “involvement” of each person with goals that are important for social life. 

Key words

Plato, the Theory of Forms, constitutional axiology, theory of constitutional law 

 Download PDF
References

1. Fouillèe A. La philosophie de Platon. T. 1. Thèorie des idèes et de l’amour [The philosophy of Plato. Vol. 1. Theory of ideas and love]. 2nd ed. Paris: Hachette, 1888.
2. Kelsen H. General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russell and Russell, 1961.
3. Auffarth A. Die platonische Ideenlehre [The Platonic theory of ideas]. Marburg: Philipps-Universität Marburg, 1883.
4. Bol'shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya: v 30 t. [Great Soviet Encyclopedia: in 30 volumes]. Gen. ed. A. M. Prokhorov. 3d ed. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1971, vol. 5: Veshin – Gazli, 640 p. [In Russian]
5. Oeuvres de Platon, traduites par Victor Cousin. Tome premier. Phedon. Argument philosophique [Works by Plato, translated by Victor Cousin. T. I. Phedon. Philosophical argument]. Paris: Bossange Freres, 1822. Available at:
https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Ph%C3%A9don_(trad._Cousin)/Argument_philosophique (accessed Jan. 28, 2019).
6. Windelband W. Platon. 3d ed. Stuttgart: Frommanns Verlag, 1901.
7. Platon. Sochineniya: v 4 t.; ed. A. F. Losev, V. F. Asmus. Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo un-ta: Izd-vo Olega Abyshko, 2007, vol. 3, part 1. [In Russian]
8. Zeller E. Grundriss der Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie [The foundation of the history of Greek philosophy]. 4th ed. Leipzig: Reisland, 1893. 

 

Дата создания: 27.06.2019 09:06
Дата обновления: 27.06.2019 09:47